Functional outcome after ischaemic stroke and intracerebral haemorrhage from two national cohorts

Author profile image News aggregator
0 comments

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC

  • It is widely assumed that outcome is worse after intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) compared with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), but there is a lack of contemporary data to confirm or refute this assumption or explain any differences.

  • WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

  • In this large observational study pooling individual data of 111 038 patients from two national stroke registries from high-income countries with universal healthcare access, ICH was associated with poorer outcome at 3 months compared with AIS (adjusted OR for favourable functional outcome: 0.42, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.45, p<0.001).

  • The association was only partly mediated by higher baseline stroke severity and the availability of recanalisation therapies for AIS.

  • Half of the effect remains unexplained by measures of stroke severity and is potentially attributable to overall care limitations in patients with ICH.

  • HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY

  • This study highlights key differences in outcomes...

  • Source: Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry - Online First ยท Published 13 Oct 2026 ยท Imported 17 Oct 2026

    Read the article