Resume drafts Unsaved story and dashboard drafts
Comment drafts Unsaved comment drafts
Christoff Truter profile picture

Christoff Truter

Public profile
Spousal caregiver
3 posts 38 comments 2 discussions 04 Aug 2026
Software developer, amateur astronomer, reluctant backyard neurologist by necessity while helping my wife navigate a complex neurological illness, creator of FND Nope (fndnope.org) a resource challenging the Functional Neurological Disorder diagnosis, sharing patient stories, and advocating for better investigation of underlying causes, and professional Trekkie.
Posts
3
Filtered by tag
Featured articles
Hand-picked posts that should be highlighted on the homepage and surfaced to new visitors first.
The Common Phenotypes Hypothesis
1 month ago

An exploration of FND, positive rule-in signs, comorbidity, predictive processing, diagnostic closure, and whether functional symptoms may reflect common phenotypes arising from multiple underlying conditions.

Advice from an FND Sceptic for Those Newly Diagnosed
6 months ago

What advice would I give to anyone newly diagnosed with this disorder? Advice that I wish I had received back then?

FND: A Diagnosis That Shuts Doors?
1 year ago

A critical examination of Functional Neurological Disorder, its historical roots, diagnostic evolution, and whether the shift to a positive diagnosis risks closing the door on further investigation.

Comments
38
In reply to Sable Lynx

What always boggles my mind is how quickly skepticism about the FND label, especially in cases like this one, gets framed as denial or something harmful. Skepticism is not denial of the symptoms or the suffering. It is a legitimate response when the patient themselves says they don't understand how the diagnosis was reached, no clear positive clinical signs or explanation were communicated, and it felt like a nothing else fits conclusion, with no real treatment plan or forward path.


Shouldn't the priority be listening to the patient's actual experience and asking why the diagnostic process wasn't more transparent? Good medicine welcomes questions and second opinions, especially with sudden, purely cognitive changes that have devastated someone's career and daily life.


Why discourage exploring reasonable alternatives such as Long COVID related brain fog, POTS, autoimmune encephalitis, microbiome issues, and so on? Considering differentials doesn't invalidate FND if that is the right fit. It just protects the patient from a potentially premature label. Many of us have seen cases where digging deeper changed everything.


In reply to Con Bradley

Yeah, that's the first website most patients diagnosed with FND are directed to, along with https://neurosymptoms.org

It is very strange, isn't it?


@Copper Comet of Lagoon Just out of interest (I'm not sure what your background is, cons of anonymous comments), based on your comment, am I right in thinking that you consider the CSF leak to have been incidental and the surgery unnecessary? That doesn't appear to be the interpretation of the authors.


If so, and assuming you're a clinician, wouldn't that make you less likely to consider or investigate a CSF leak as a differential diagnosis in a similar patient? That's what concerns me.



@Copper Comet of Lagoon Your comment inadvertently illustrates exactly the point of the post. Even though the patient had remained symptom free for up to three months after the CSF leak was repaired, you preserve the FND diagnosis through explanations like functional overlay, comorbidity, placebo, attention, predictive processing, or by questioning the significance of the repair itself, something the authors of the paper do not question.


One other point is that the paper itself does not treat the CSF leak as an incidental finding or question whether it required repair. Those are additional interpretations. The authors accepted it as a curable underlying pathology, repaired it, and reported complete symptom resolution, yet still retained the FND diagnosis.


Replied to The Common Phenotypes Hypothesis · 17 Jun 2026






Replied to Hoping one day we each will recover · 05 Jun 2026





Your comment is quite chilling to read! Quite interesting that you mentioned "the use of sunglasses", wearing sunglasses indoors (the sunglasses sign), is something that is considered possibly indicative of FND https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9159904/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5656827_The_sunglasses_sign_predicts_nonorganic_visual_loss_in_neuro-ophthalmologic_practice Though some proponents would like to claim that that is no longer the case (somewhat like an old testament FND approach) Nice shades, have you considered FND?

Discussions started
2

You can literally go onto https://fndconnect.org.uk/shop/product/fnd-connect-i-have-seizures-lanyard-and-card

And for £ 4.99 you can buy yourself a lanyard to inform bystanders to effectively discourage appropriate emergency care.

Someone may assume every episode is "just another functional seizure." But seizures can change, suffer a head injury, have a stroke,

low blood sugar, cardiac syncope, or another medical emergency.


Started Red flags on 22 Jun 2026
3 replies

Looking back, was there a symptom(s) that should have prompted doctors to investigate further before diagnosis FND?