Resume drafts Unsaved story and dashboard drafts
Comment drafts Unsaved comment drafts
Christoff profile picture

Christoff

Public profile
Spousal caregiver
38 posts 53 comments 3 discussions Last seen 31 Oct 2026 Member since 02 Jul 2025
Software developer, amateur astronomer, reluctant backyard neurologist by necessity while helping my wife navigate a complex neurological illness, creator of FND Nope (fndnope.org) a resource challenging the Functional Neurological Disorder diagnosis, sharing patient stories, and advocating for better investigation of underlying causes, and professional Trekkie.
Stance towards FND
Questioning or sceptical of FND
Community trophies
Game trophies

Personal Space

Christoff’s Space

For my wife. For answers. For as long as it takes.

Visit Personal Space
Posts
38
I Am Angry
3 weeks ago

I am angry that uncertainty became certainty, that softened language obscures what is actually being claimed, that scepticism is treated as hostility, and that while we argue about FND, my wife keeps getting sicker.

When the Tests Find Something, but We Still Have to Find the Answers
3 weeks ago

An update on my wife’s worsening gastrointestinal problems, the objectively demonstrated delayed intestinal transit, what has been excluded, what still needs investigation, and why it feels wrong that we are being left to work out the next steps ourselves.

Open Letter to Zachary Grin, DPT
2 months ago

An open letter addressing the removal of a disputed cartoon, clarifying what was—and was not—claimed, and reaffirming FND Nope’s commitment to open and critical discussion of the FND framework.

The Common Phenotypes Hypothesis
4 months ago

An exploration of FND, positive rule-in signs, comorbidity, predictive processing, diagnostic closure, and whether functional symptoms may reflect common phenotypes arising from multiple underlying conditions.

The Belief Prerequisite: How FND Treatment Echoes Faith Healing
5 months ago

One of the most striking things you notice when you first start reading the literature on FND is how crucial it is considered for patients to accept and believe in the diagnosis. Without that belief, treatment is often regarded as futile. They simply will not get better.

What Makes a Doctor a Good Doctor?
6 months ago

A reflection on what makes a good doctor in the context of complex chronic illness, focusing on collaboration, systems thinking, and clinical humility.

Fatigable Weakness vs Functional Weakness: Why Hoover’s Sign Can Mislead When Isokinetic Testing Shows Otherwise
7 months ago

Examines Hoover's sign in a patient with true fatigable weakness. Highlights how objective isokinetic testing better captures performance deficits than traditional clinical signs, preventing misinterpretation as functional weakness.

When Diagnosis Becomes Doctrine: Questioning FND and Clinical Authority
7 months ago

When I started this website in July 2025, I received a lot of pushback from FND proponents. Some felt that the website was highly offensive and disrespectful, and urged me to please take the website down, which I obviously did not do.

FND's Flawed Analogy: When 'Software' Problems can Hide Undetected Hardware Damage
7 months ago

One of the most common analogies that you would come across within FND literature is the software/hardware analogy.

If FND Scepticism Feels Like a Personal Attack, It Might Be Time for Introspection
8 months ago

FND patient communities provide support but risk echo chambers: illness becomes identity, criticism feels like attack, closing doors to misdiagnosis & recovery—modern hysteria protected by groupthink.

Comments
53
In reply to Con Bradley

Yeah, that's the first website most patients diagnosed with FND are directed to, along with https://neurosymptoms.org

It is very strange, isn't it?


@Copper Comet of Lagoon Just out of interest (I'm not sure what your background is, cons of anonymous comments), based on your comment, am I right in thinking that you consider the CSF leak to have been incidental and the surgery unnecessary? That doesn't appear to be the interpretation of the authors.


If so, and assuming you're a clinician, wouldn't that make you less likely to consider or investigate a CSF leak as a differential diagnosis in a similar patient? That's what concerns me.


@Copper Comet of Lagoon Your comment inadvertently illustrates exactly the point of the post. Even though the patient had remained symptom free for up to three months after the CSF leak was repaired, you preserve the FND diagnosis through explanations like functional overlay, comorbidity, placebo, attention, predictive processing, or by questioning the significance of the repair itself, something the authors of the paper do not question.


One other point is that the paper itself does not treat the CSF leak as an incidental finding or question whether it required repair. Those are additional interpretations. The authors accepted it as a curable underlying pathology, repaired it, and reported complete symptom resolution, yet still retained the FND diagnosis.



Your comment is quite chilling to read! Quite interesting that you mentioned "the use of sunglasses", wearing sunglasses indoors (the sunglasses sign), is something that is considered possibly indicative of FND https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9159904/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5656827_The_sunglasses_sign_predicts_nonorganic_visual_loss_in_neuro-ophthalmologic_practice Though some proponents would like to claim that that is no longer the case (somewhat like an old testament FND approach) Nice shades, have you considered FND?

@Miranda, that is basically blasphemy. When a diagnosis follows a narrative similar to the faith-healing mantra, it raises serious red flags for anyone paying attention.

@Lymewearier I find it quite ironic that you’re bringing up the faith aspect here. I've been working on an article over the past week about this very parallel I've been noticing from day one. There's a very clear similarity between how faith healers operate and how this diagnosis is often presented and phrased. But the parallel goes much deeper than that. I'm not just talking about placebos — I'm also referring to the underlying mechanics used by faith healers, which are strikingly similar in form and function to those seen in CBT and similar approaches (not saying they’re exactly the same, but very similar). Unfortunately, that mechanism carries a very real danger when accepted and followed blindly. Patients can end up suffering from similar delusions and risks as those seen in churches that promote this kind of practice. I'll be sure to post the link here as soon as the article is finished.

Replied to Who am I? Why am I doing this? · 11 May 2026
No, none of this is COVID-related. My wife started deteriorating slowly many years before the pandemic.

Thank you for taking the time to respond. Firstly, can we agree that communication to Miranda was clearly lacking and poorly delivered? That seems evident from her account. I fully understand the modern definition of FND as a rule-in diagnosis based on positive signs per DSM-5. However, in practice and even in the DSM-5 wording itself (Criterion 3: not better explained by another medical or mental disorder), exclusionary thinking remains prominent. We should be honest about the criteria: they still contain strong exclusionary elements, and statistics on how clinicians actually apply FND show it is often used when tests are incomplete (CD model still used) or red flags are downplayed. As you like to constantly remind me, I am not a clinician, I can definitely get details wrong. But I have a serious problem when a diagnosis is applied in such an opaque, almost esoteric way that shuts down further investigation. Constantly pointing out that I am not a clinician also comes across as counterproductive and dismissive to open discussion. As I understand it, untreated autoimmune encephalitis can allow months of fluctuating symptoms and partial function (including online posting) before severe decline. A relentlessly progressive course with accumulating encephalopathic features (delirium, psychosis, catatonia) and hard signs like Hoffmann’s is atypical for pure FND. Family autoimmune history is relevant to pretest probability.

It is particularly concerning that, rather than directly addressing Miranda's specific concerns and the red flags she highlighted (omitted symptoms in the notes, the ignored positive Hoffmann's sign, the family history of autoimmune disease, and the explicit refusal to pursue autoimmune workup), you chose to frame her scepticism itself as the central problem instead. When a patient raises reasonable doubts, surely good practice involves clearly explaining the reasoning, including how potentially treatable organic conditions have been confidently excluded, rather than dismissing further inquiry. Why can't you accept skepticism and engage with it constructively? It is very doubtful whether you thoroughly reviewed the account (seems like a superficial reading only). Let's break down the key mismatches with a functional neurological disorder (FND) diagnosis:
  1. Relentlessly progressive course steadily accumulating symptoms over months with no sustained improvement or fluctuation. Classic FND is typically variable, waxing and waning, and often shows periods of spontaneous improvement.
  2. Prominent encephalopathic features delirium, psychosis, catatonia, and rapid cognitive/personality change. These are not core features of FND and are far more suggestive of underlying organic brain dysfunction, such as autoimmune or inflammatory encephalitis.
  3. Objective hard neurological signs positive Hoffmann's sign and MRI findings of demyelination described as too much for age. FND is a technically a diagnosis of exclusion that requires symptoms to be incompatible with recognised organic disease.
  4. Lack of documented positive FND signs for most symptoms only leg weakness appears to have had such signs recorded. Surely a robust FND diagnosis should document specific rule in signs (e.g., Hoover's sign, entrainment, give way weakness, etc.) for each major complaint.
  5. Clear post infectious trigger plus strong family autoimmune history both are well established risk factors for autoimmune encephalitis and other neuroinflammatory conditions that require proper rule out, not dismissal.
  6. Psychiatrist explicitly ruled out primary psychiatric disorder this significantly weakens any trauma based or psychogenic explanation for the neurological picture (for those following the CD model that is sometimes still used in FND).
A thorough, evidence based response would have engaged with these points directly instead of defaulting to the assumption that any mention of FND automatically makes further investigation inappropriate. Patients and families are right to expect that serious, treatable differentials especially post infectious autoimmune encephalitis are systematically excluded when the clinical picture does not fit the FND pattern cleanly.

Discussions started
3


Initial interview with Christine Aumann, Maddie Aumann’s mother, on REAL TALK 93.3FM, discussing Maddie’s Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) diagnosis, her subsequent medical journey, and the impact the FND diagnosis had on her care.


From https://www.facebook.com/RealTalk933fm/videos/1095299976492411/


You can literally go onto https://fndconnect.org.uk/shop/product/fnd-connect-i-have-seizures-lanyard-and-card

And for £ 4.99 you can buy yourself a lanyard to inform bystanders to effectively discourage appropriate emergency care.

Someone may assume every episode is "just another functional seizure." But seizures can change, suffer a head injury, have a stroke,

low blood sugar, cardiac syncope, or another medical emergency.


Started Red flags on 22 Jun 2026
3 replies

Looking back, was there a symptom(s) that should have prompted doctors to investigate further before diagnosis FND?